A non-QM website that explains who you serve without promising who qualifies

Each page describes the kind of borrower and situation the program was designed for and what documentation is generally involved, and it says clearly that whether a program fits is decided in underwriting. Your compliance team reviews every page before launch.

A dedicated broker page explains how to work with you and carries a short inquiry form routed to your wholesale team. Full submissions still go through your existing broker portal; the site links to it.

Yes. General explainers on documentation for self-employed borrowers, how investor loans differ, and what the process looks like, with sources cited and no claims about any reader's eligibility.

Whatever your compliance team specifies: identifiers, state licensing lines, equal housing notice and any program-specific disclosure. It sits in the same position on every page and changes everywhere at once when it needs to.

By describing the borrower situations the programs exist for rather than the reader in front of the page. A page can say a bank statement program exists for self-employed borrowers whose tax returns understate their income, and stop there. It must not say that a self-employed reader will qualify, what their terms would be, or that approval is likely. That line is where most non-QM copy goes wrong and it is where ours stops.

That is what the revision allowance is for. A program added, retired or renamed is a revision, of any size, completed inside the stated turnaround. Because the program pages share one structure and one disclosure block, a change to how programs are described is made once rather than page by page.

Yes, and they are usually a separate section rather than a separate site. Brokers and correspondents want different things from a borrower: submission requirements, who to contact, how scenarios are handled, what turn times look like in general terms. A partner section that answers those properly does more for your submissions than a rate sheet on the home page.

Only if they are genuine, anonymized with permission and framed as past examples rather than as what a reader can expect. No invented scenarios, no representative numbers that were never real, and a clear statement that a past file does not indicate what any other borrower will be offered. If your compliance team would rather avoid scenarios entirely, the pages work without them.